Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2018 4:54 PM
Subject: California is no longer
a republic
Currently,
as few as 63 individuals can completely control the legislative process in
California thanks to the lopsided balance of political power. While in a sense
this has always been the case, it was not until the Supreme Court overruled the
will of the people in 1964 case Reynolds
v Sims that the balance of power was shifted, such that one party gained
what appears to have become a permanent monopoly over the legislature and
governorship.
As a
result, the State of California is no longer a republic, but instead an
oligarchy. The politicians wield power
due to disproportionate representation given to the large metropolitan areas of
the state. Under the current scenario, the democratic process is a sham that
has completely undermined the concept of a functioning representative
republic.
The
original California Constitution provided for 80 assembly districts and 40
senate districts each based on population.
In the
1920’s, in order to rectify a situation where Los Angeles and other large
metropolitan areas had acquired exorbitant control over the political process,
the electorate changed the dynamics of the State Senate to mirror the U.S.
Senate, via a 1926 ballot proposition 28.
This limited any county from having more than one Senator (in 1911, Los
Angeles County had 8 Senators, and three bay area counties combined had 13
Senators, giving majority control to those 4 heavily populated counties in both
house of the legislature).
After
proposition 28 passed, those same 4 counties had 4 Senators total instead of
the previous 21, and the balance of power in the state was restored—the
Assembly still represented the population, but the Senate represented the
diverse interests of the various counties (similar to the U.S. Senate).
Article
4, Section 4 of the Constitution provides:
“The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a
Republican Form of Government…” Other
than guaranteeing each state a republican form of government, it gave the
federal government no authority to otherwise interfere with the composition of
its legislature. Yet, the U.S. Supreme
Court exceeded its authority under the Constitution and destroyed that
guarantee.
As a
result of the Warren Court decision in Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964),
the California Senate was required to revert to the pre-Proposition 28
configuration. While I challenge that the Warren Court had any jurisdiction to
interfere with the internal configuration of a state legislature—to me an
example of judicial overreach—it did usurp authority over the States and
unfortunately the States complied.
As a
result, Los Angeles County now has 14 of the 40 State Senators, and the large
metropolitan centers of the bay area and Los Angeles combined have enough seats
to control both the Assembly and Senate once again. Due to the dynamics
of today’s urban culture, these large metropolitan areas are dominated by the
Left leaning Democratic Party political agenda.
Politicians from these few counties can control the show, the rest of
the State be damned.
California
is no longer a republic, but a one party state, a political oligarchy where as
few as 63 individuals (41 in the Assembly, 21 in the Senate, and the governor)
are sufficient to have monopoly control over the politics of the state.
As a
result, a few state legislators can (and do) act independent of the best
interests of the public, creating law to suit their whims and ideological
agenda.
Dumbed
down and naïve people may think they have a choice in California, but they
don’t.